Lunch from 12:00 · Seminar 12:45–13:45 · Registration required
Open to everyone interested in space ethics. We welcome researchers, students, practitioners, space professionals and anyone curious about the ethical, social and political questions raised by humanity’s activities beyond Earth.
The series is convened by Dr Koji Tachibana, Academic Lead, Associate Professor of Philosophy at Chiba University and Academic Visitor at the Uehiro Oxford Institute.
Description:
Human spaceflight increasingly treats reproductive health and fertility as medical concerns. Radiation, altered gravity, isolation, and other features of the space environment may affect reproductive organs, gametes, pregnancy, and embryonic development. As long-duration missions and future space settlements become more plausible, protecting fertility may therefore appear to be an obvious goal of space medicine. This paper asks whether that assumption is justified. I argue that reproductive health, reproductive capacity, and reproduction itself should be kept conceptually distinct. Space medicine has strong reasons to prevent damage to reproductive organs, treat reproductive disease, and protect the reproductive autonomy of individual patients. It does not follow, however, that preserving the capacity to reproduce is itself a medical obligation, particularly when fertility is valued because future missions or settlements are expected to depend on demographic continuity. This distinction becomes especially important in small and isolated populations. In such settings, fertility may cease to be understood primarily as an individual capacity and instead become a resource required for the survival of the settlement. Medicine may then shift from protecting patients to protecting reproduction as a collective objective. An antinatalist perspective helps expose the normative assumption behind this move: that the creation of future people, and the continuation of the population through them, is itself a good that medicine should help secure. The argument does not require the conclusion that reproduction in space is always wrong. Rather, it challenges the idea that reproductive capacity should automatically be treated as a health good. I argue that space medicine should protect reproductive health and reproductive autonomy, but should not treat fertility or population continuity as medical ends in themselves. This distinction has implications for fertility preservation, radiation standards, reproductive technologies, mission planning, and the governance of future space settlements.
Speaker:
Prof. Konrad Szocik, PhD, Habil.
Department of Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów (UITM), Poland
Lunch is provided. Please register and indicate any dietary requirements.
Registration
